Regarding the user who had interesting takes on game balance

So, assuming that you're either

A) A curious browser who wants to know the tea, welcome, the tea is hot but not above 80 degrees

B) A user who has seen the original post, hi, want to contribute to this discussion?

C) The original poster, this is mainly for you as I assume that you're involved in this community to some degree

D) Someone outside of this community, in which why are you here? Go to r/wholesomefantasyart, it's far better than this post

So, the original poster had made a post talking about how Archer should be OP (Overpowered, not Original Poster), as compensation for how Hullabaloo has made IDV somewhat more miserable and his impact on today's meta.

Well, I'm not here to disparage the original poster, as they are probably a lower tier player and frustrated about the current situation, in which I feel you, there's always something to learn. Their post got hated on (Extensively) to the point of being removed, but this wouldn't help them as their questions would remain unanswered and frustration fueled further.

Well, I'll keep this already long-winded post shorter and save both of us some precious time. Making a member or mechanic of a faction unbalanced as "Retaliation" for an unbalanced character or mechanic from the opposing faction is an absolutely daft idea. Look at when BQ came waltzing in and left a sizeable hole in the meta wall, Flywheel was introduced, and now all hunter players have to suffer from it. Making Brynhildr overpowered would not suffice as a balance for the absolute dumpster fire of Hullabaloo's kit, as this would end up in characters being more overpowered to counter their predecessor and the rest of us suffer as collateral damage in the meta cycle.

Original Poster, I hope this answered your passion-filled post, and to everyone else, thank you for coming to this post that took me twelve minutes to type.